S-corp payroll: reasonable compensation
The S election saves payroll tax on profit taken as distributions, but only after the owner is paid a reasonable salary through payroll. Skip the salary and the IRS can recharacterize distributions as wages, years later, with back taxes, penalties, and interest.
The rule
Shareholders who perform more than minor services for an S-corporation are employees. Before the company distributes profit to them, it must pay them W-2 wages that reflect reasonable compensation for the work they do. There is no safe-harbor percentage in the tax code; “reasonable” means roughly what the business would have to pay someone else to do the same job.
The IRS and courts look at factors including:
- the owner's training, experience, duties, and responsibilities;
- time and effort devoted to the business;
- what comparable businesses pay for similar services;
- the company's gross receipts, profits, and dividend history;
- how salary and distributions have been split over time.
What happens if you get it wrong
Courts have repeatedly upheld reclassification. In a well-known case, an accountant who paid himself $24,000 in salary while taking over $200,000 in distributions had a large part of the distributions treated as wages, with employment taxes and penalties owed on the difference. A $0 salary with large distributions is the pattern most likely to draw scrutiny.
Going too high has a cost too: every salary dollar above reasonable pays payroll tax the S election was meant to save. The goal is a defensible number, not the lowest one.
Setting a defensible salary
- List the roles you actually perform, for example, 60% software engineer and 40% general manager.
- Price each role using market data: Bureau of Labor Statistics wage data for your metro area, salary surveys, or offers you've seen for similar work.
- Weight by time spent and adjust for part-time hours.
- Write a one-page memo with the sources and keep it with your tax records; update it when your role or the business changes.
If the business can't yet afford a market salary, a lower wage can be reasonable, but taking large distributions at the same time undercuts that argument.
The payroll machinery
- Payroll provider (Gusto, Rippling, ADP, or similar) to run pay, withhold, and deposit taxes on schedule.
- Federal: Form 941 quarterly, Form 940 annually for unemployment tax, and W-2/W-3 by January 31.
- California: register with the EDD; withhold state income tax and SDI; pay unemployment insurance and the employment training tax; file DE 9 and DE 9C quarterly. Other states have their own equivalents.
- Health insurance paid for a more-than-2% owner is added to their W-2 wages (it's exempt from Social Security and Medicare) and they may deduct it personally.
Worked example
A consultant's S-corp earns $180,000 of profit before owner pay. With a documented $100,000 salary, the company pays about $7,650 of employer payroll tax and withholds the same from the owner: about $15,300 total. The remaining ~$72,000 of profit comes out as distributions free of payroll tax. As an LLC, nearly the whole $180,000 would have been subject to self-employment tax. Net savings depend on the Social Security wage base, state unemployment costs, and provider fees, typically several thousand dollars a year at this level, which is why the election pays off once profit comfortably exceeds a market salary.
Compare the California side in LLC vs S-corp with math and read the election guide before filing Form 2553.
Sources
- IRC §§ 1366, 1372 (2% shareholder fringe benefits), 3111, 3121; Rev. Rul. 74-44; IRS S-corporation compensation guidance
- Forms 941, 940, W-2 instructions; California EDD DE 9/DE 9C instructions